翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ CCGS Sora ・ CCGS Teleost ・ CCGS Terry Fox ・ CCGS Thunder Cape ・ CCGS Tracy ・ CCGS Tuebor ・ CCGS Tupper ・ CCGS Vector ・ CCGS W. E. Ricker ・ CCGS Westport ・ CCGS Wilfred Templeman ・ CCGT ・ CCH ・ CCH (company) ・ CCH Canadian ・ CCH Canadian Ltd v Law Society of Upper Canada ・ CCHA Best Goaltender ・ CCHA Men's Ice Hockey Tournament ・ CCHCR1 ・ Cche ・ CCHL ・ CcHost ・ CCHP ・ CCHR ・ CCHS ・ CCI ・ CCI (ammunition) ・ CCI Europe ・ CCI Phantom ・ CCIAA Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク CCH Canadian Ltd v Law Society of Upper Canada ： ウィキペディア英語版 CCH Canadian Ltd v Law Society of Upper Canada ''CCH Canadian Ltd v Law Society of Upper Canada'', () 1 SCR 339,〔''CCH Canadian Ltd. v. Law Society of Upper Canada'', () 1 SCR 339 ()〕 is a landmark Supreme Court of Canada case that established the threshold of originality and the bounds of fair dealing in Canadian copyright law. A group of publishers sued the Law Society of Upper Canada for copyright infringement for providing photocopy services to researchers. The Court unanimously held that the Law Society's practice fell within the bounds of fair dealing. == Background == Since 1954 the Law Society of Upper Canada, a statutory, non-profit organization, offered request-based photocopying services to students, members, the judiciary, and authorized researchers at their Great Library at Osgoode Hall. The Law Society provided single copies of legal articles, statutes, and decisions to those who requested them. It also allowed visitors to the Great Library to use photocopiers to make individual copies of works held by the library.,〔''CCH'' at para 1〕 Three of the largest publishers of legal sources, CCH Canadian Limited, Carswell Thomson Professional Publishing and Canada Law Book Inc., sued the Law Society for copyright infringement of 11 specific works based on these activities. They requested relief in the form a declaration of subsistence of copyright in these works and a permanent injunction barring the Great Library from reproducing these works or any other works published by the plaintiffs.〔''CCH'' at para 2〕 In response, the Law Society argued that the services it offered were necessary to provide equal access to the library's collection of legal materials. Many of the materials held at the library are non-circulating, which makes access to the original copies difficult to those who do not work near-by. The Law Society sought a declaration that its activities did not infringe on the publishers' copyrights, by either the provision of a single copy of a work or by allowing patrons to avail themselves of the self-service photocopiers.〔''CCH'' at para 3〕 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「CCH Canadian Ltd v Law Society of Upper Canada」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.